Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than OPPO Find X6 Pro, with a 95.4 score against 72.7. Even though the Galaxy S22 Ultra is older and a bit heavier than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's design is still just a bit thinner. Both phones we are comparing have the same Android 13 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding operating system features.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a little bit higher pixel density, a brighter screen and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3168. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a really superior processing power than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a battery performance that is just as good as the battery duration in OPPO Find X6 Pro.
Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than OPPO Find X6 Pro, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much better video quality, a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.