Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's score of 72.7. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S7 is older than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's construction is way lighter and somewhat thinner. Galaxy S7 has a much more powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S7, because although it has a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a really larger screen, a really brighter screen and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
OPPO Find X6 Pro has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.