Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a bit better than OPPO Find X6 Pro, having a 75.8 score against 72.7. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active body is lighter than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it's a little bit thicker and was released many years before. The Galaxy S7 Active has a much greater hardware performance than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has lesser cpu cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a just a little worse pixels count per inch in the display, it also counts with a really bigger screen, much more brightness and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels. OPPO Find X6 Pro has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much better 50 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.