Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 has a general score of 81.7, which is better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's global score of 72.7. Samsung Galaxy S8's construction is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it was released 6 years before. The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a better display than Galaxy S8, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution and a larger screen.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy S8 counts with a very superior processing unit than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing images or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor, a back camera with a much better resolution and higher video frame rate.
OPPO Find X6 Pro has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.