Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has an overall score of 81.9, which is better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's global score of 72.7. Although Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is noticeably older and just a little thicker than OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's body is still a little lighter. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a way better hardware performance than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a more vivid display than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a little bit higher 1440 x 3168 resolution. OPPO Find X6 Pro has a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro has greater battery life than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos and a much higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.