Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is much better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, with a overall score of 83.3 against 72.7. Although Galaxy S9 is incredibly older than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's body is noticeably lighter and a little bit thinner. OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much better looking display than Galaxy S9, because although it has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a larger display.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much better performing CPU than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.