Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2023-03-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 512 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is much better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, having a global score of 80.1 against 72.7. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13 version. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is notably older, thicker and somewhat heavier than the OPPO Find X6 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better performance than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a lot larger screen.
OPPO Find X6 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images or videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much better resolution back camera, a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a much bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.