Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is much better than OPPO Find X6 Pro's 72.7 global score. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's body is much older, just a bit thicker and a little heavier than OPPO Find X6 Pro. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version while OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13 version.
OPPO Find X6 Pro has a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a quite larger display. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a much more powerful CPU than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
OPPO Find X6 Pro features a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent greater battery size.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a camera in the back with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a much better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.