Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is way better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's global score of 72.7. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version while OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13 version. Although the Galaxy Z Flip is a lot older than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's body is lighter and extremely thinner.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution, a bit larger screen and a little higher pixels amount in each display inch. Galaxy Z Flip has a very superior processor than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
OPPO Find X6 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same aperture and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a way bigger back camera sensor and a way more MP camera in the back. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the OPPO Find X6 Pro, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X6 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.