Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than OPPO Find X6 Pro, having a score of 92.3 against 72.7. Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is extremely older than OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's construction is notably thinner and lighter. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version and OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much faster processing unit than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. OPPO Find X6 Pro features an incredibly better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a bit more pixels per screen inch, a little bit larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3168.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a back camera with a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a much bigger camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's storage for games and applications is just as good as the OPPO Find X6 Pro one, both have equal 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.