Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro's global score of 72.7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a older and incredibly heavier cellphone than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it much thinner anyway. These phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version and OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a lot better display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with as much memory to install games and applications as the OPPO Find X6 Pro one, both of them have equal internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a really superior performance than OPPO Find X6 Pro. Both have a 12 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. OPPO Find X6 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and photos and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.