Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, getting a overall score of 82.5 against 73.5. Even though the Google Pixel 2 XL is much older than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's construction is thinner and lighter. Google Pixel 2 XL has a much faster processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features an incredibly better looking screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a little bit higher 1440 x 3168 resolution. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 42 percent bigger battery size. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra captures greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality, faster video frame rate and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.