Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having an 80 score against 73.5. Google Pixel 3's body is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, although it was released many years before. OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a lot better screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a bigger display, a better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution and a bit greater pixel density.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. Google Pixel 3 features a lot better hardware performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more cpu cores.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same video quality, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, faster video frame rates and a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.