Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 overall score. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 3a is a lot older than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's body is noticeably lighter and thinner. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a has the previous 11 version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a much better performing processor than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and also faster). OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a bit more pixels per display inch, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a larger screen.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. OPPO Find X7 Ultra captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a camera with way more mega pixels, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much bigger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.