Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a global score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 global score. Even though Google Pixel 3a XL is incredibly older than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's body is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 3a XL has older 11 version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version.
Google Pixel 3a XL features a very superior processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little larger display, more pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 3168 resolution.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with much more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 35% greater battery capacity. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a lot bigger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.