Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is much better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, with a score of 82.9 against 73.5. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 4a is extremely older than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's construction is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has an older 11 version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version.
The Google Pixel 4a has a much more powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a lot better screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a bigger screen, a higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution and a bit greater pixels density.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra takes greater pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a way larger camera sensor, a lot higher 50 MP resolution camera in the back and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.