Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is much better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's score of 73.5. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the older 11 version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body is thinner and noticeably lighter than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 6 GB less RAM, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution, a little bit more pixels per display inch and a quite bigger screen.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 29% more battery size. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a way more mega pixels back camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.