Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, getting an 89 score against 73.5. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 5 is much older than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's design is lighter and thinner. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a much greater performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a way better screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a quite larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a little bit better pixels density. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4080mAh. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.