Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 512 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is a bit better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, getting a 77 score against 73.5. Despite of the fact that the HTC U Ultra is noticeably older than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's construction is somewhat thinner and way lighter. HTC U Ultra features a much faster processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much sharper screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a just a little inferior number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a bigger screen. HTC U Ultra has a better memory to install games and applications than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity. OPPO Find X7 Ultra captures much clearer photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video quality and the same camera aperture, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a much larger camera sensor, a back camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution and faster video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.