Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 512 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is slightly better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, with a overall score of 77.6 against 73.5. The HTC U11 is an notably older phone than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but HTC managed to build it a lot lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a way better screen than HTC U11, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3168.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. HTC U11 features a much better performing CPU than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a camera with a way better resolution, a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a really longer battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.