Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is much better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's general score of 73.5. LG G8S ThinQ is an a lot older phone than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but LG managed to make it somewhat lighter and thinner. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but LG G8S ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version, so it gives you a couple nice extra features.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution, more pixels per inch of display and a bit bigger display. LG G8S ThinQ has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G8S ThinQ features a really superior performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a very superior battery lifetime than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate, a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.