Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is much better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 global score. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but LG K92 has the previous 10 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14. The LG K92 is an a lot older phone than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but it's thinner and a little lighter anyway.
The LG K92 has a much powerful processor than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and faster). OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than LG K92, because it has a better 1440 x 3168px resolution, a better number of pixels per inch of display and a quite larger screen.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra shoots slightly better pictures and videos than LG K92, because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution and a much lower 50 mega pixels resolution camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a much larger sensor capturing way higher quality photographs and videos.
The LG K92 has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features superior battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.