Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-01-08 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is much better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 score. LG V30S ThinQ's body is a lot thinner and extremely lighter than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, even though it was released 6 years before. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a way better display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a quite larger screen. The LG V30S ThinQ has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ features a much more powerful processor than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 6 GB less RAM, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much better battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery size. OPPO Find X7 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality, better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.