Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, with a overall score of 81.3 against 73.5. The LG V35 ThinQ body is noticeably lighter and incredibly thinner than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bigger storage to install games and applications than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a much better performing CPU than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a way better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.