Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 global score. The LG V40 ThinQ is an incredibly older cellphone than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but it is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter anyway. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much better looking screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a just a little lower pixel amount in each display inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a quite bigger screen. The LG V40 ThinQ has more storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a very superior performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more cores. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a way better battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 52% bigger battery capacity. OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a superior camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.