Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having a global score of 87.1 against 73.5. LG Velvet's construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. LG Velvet features a very superior performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features an incredibly better looking screen than LG Velvet, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a greater screen pixel density. LG Velvet counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with longer battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a little bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a more MP back camera, higher video frame rates and a lot bigger camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.