Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Microsoft |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having an 85.3 score against 73.5. Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is notably older and a lot heavier than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's body is still notably thinner. These phones include Android operating system, but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has an older 11 version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a way better looking screen than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and much more brightness. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a much faster processor than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a little better battery life than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4449mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.