Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-01-08 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z Force is a little bit better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having a score of 75.8 against 73.5. The Motorola Moto Z Force is an way older phone than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but Motorola managed to build it incredibly lighter and incredibly thinner. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto Z Force has a newer 7.0 Nougat version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14, giving you some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a way better performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 8 GB less RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a way better screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a quite lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher 1440 x 3168px resolution.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a back facing camera with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution and better video frame rates.
Moto Z Force counts with a quite bigger storage for apps and games than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 43 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.