Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Force Edition is a little bit better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having a 77.4 score against 73.5. The Moto Z2 Force Edition is an older device than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but it is much lighter and notably thinner anyway. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much faster processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more cpu cores.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a way better display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a little bit inferior pixels number per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a larger display. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a very superior camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a lot larger sensor providing a way higher image quality, higher video frame rate, a larger camera aperture for better images in poorly lited situations and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.