Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a general score of 77.4, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's overall score of 73.5. Motorola Moto Z2 Play's design is lighter and incredibly thinner than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, although it was released many years before. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bigger display, a better pixels quantity per screen inch and a much better 1440 x 3168 resolution.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with a way better performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 8 GB less RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a way better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution camera and better video frame rates.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.