Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has an overall score of 78.5, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 overall score. The Motorola One Action body is a little thinner and way lighter than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, even though it was released 5 years before. OPPO Find X7 Ultra features an incredibly better screen than Motorola One Action, because it has a little bit better screen pixel density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a little bigger display.
Motorola One Action has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Action features a much better performing processor than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with 7 more cores.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a very superior camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a camera with much more mega pixels and better video frame rate. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much longer battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 43% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.