Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is a bit better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having a score of 79.8 against 73.5. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS, but Motorola One Hyper has older 11 version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version. Motorola One Hyper's construction is just a bit thinner and a little lighter than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, even though it was released 4 years before.
Motorola One Hyper has a very superior processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more cores. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a way better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a higher 1440 x 3168px resolution, a higher screen pixel density and a bit larger display.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra captures slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture. Motorola One Hyper counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has greater battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.