Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a score of 80.7, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 score. Although Motorola One Vision is a lot older than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's design is a little bit thinner and lighter. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Motorola One Vision, because it has a quite higher display density, a quite larger display and a better 1440 x 3168 resolution.
The Motorola One Vision has a much powerful CPU than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. Motorola One Vision features a little bit more storage for applications and games than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality, better video frame rate and a camera with more mega pixels.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a very superior battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 43% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.