Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Nokia |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a general score of 80.3, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's global score of 73.5. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has the older 10 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's construction is a little bit thinner than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but it's a bit heavier and was released 3 years before.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a very superior CPU than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 6 GB less RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster). OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a higher pixel amount per screen inch.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with just a bit better camera than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features just a bit better battery lifetime than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.