Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a general score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's global score of 73.5. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but nubia Red Magic 3S has a newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version, so it gives you some nice extra features and performance enhancements. The nubia Red Magic 3S design is a little bit lighter than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but it is just a little thicker and was released 4 years before.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a lot better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a little larger screen, a better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a greater pixels quantity per display inch. The nubia Red Magic 3S and OPPO Find X7 Ultra feature quite similar storage to store more apps and games, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much greater hardware performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, and although they both have a 12 GB RAM memory, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger number of faster cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a slightly better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with higher video frame rate, a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a higher resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S's battery life is just as good as the OPPO Find X7 Ultra one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.