Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S is a bit better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, getting a overall score of 76.2 against 73.5. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but nubia Red Magic 5S has older 10 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version. Even though the nubia Red Magic 5S is noticeably older and a little bit thicker than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's body is still a bit lighter.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a lot better display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a little bit larger screen, much more screen brightness and more pixels per inch in the screen. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a lot better hardware performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores. Nubia Red Magic 5S takes a bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a much more MP camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features just a little bit longer battery life than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.