Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30 has a score of 79.6, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 score. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A30 is notably older than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's body is somewhat thinner and way lighter. Galaxy A30 has a lot better performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster).
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a better 1440 x 3168 resolution, a little bigger display and a better count of pixels per inch of display. OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a way higher (4K) video quality. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.