Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A5 (2017) is slightly better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having a score of 75.8 against 73.5. Even though the Galaxy A5 (2017) is older than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's construction is somewhat thinner and much lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) features a much better performing CPU than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a way better display than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a bit higher pixels count in each display inch, a lot better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a way bigger display. OPPO Find X7 Ultra captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a larger camera aperture, a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot better resolution camera.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.