Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is much better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 score. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body is noticeably lighter and thinner than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a better pixels density.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a slightly bigger memory to install games and applications than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 features a really superior performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity. OPPO Find X7 Ultra captures better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.