Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, getting a score of 86.6 against 73.5. The Galaxy A50s is an notably older cellphone than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but it is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS, but the Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a way better display than Galaxy A50s, because it has a better pixels density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a bit bigger display. Galaxy A50s features a much faster CPU than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a larger camera aperture, a more MP camera, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a much bigger sensor. The Galaxy A50s has a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with improved battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.