Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having a general score of 85.5 against 73.5. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version. Galaxy A51 is an notably older cellphone than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but it's lighter and somewhat thinner anyway.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a little bit bigger display, a higher screen density and a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a much better performing processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a camera with a better resolution, faster video frame rates and a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features better battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.