Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 global score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version. Galaxy A51 5G's body is lighter and just a little bit thinner than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, even though it was released many years before.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much sharper display than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a better number of pixels per inch in the screen, a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a little bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better performing processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations, a back facing camera with more mega pixels and a much bigger sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.