Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is way better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, with a 90.7 score against 73.5. The Galaxy A52 construction is thinner and lighter than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, although it was released many years before. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy A52, because it has a little bit bigger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features more storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 counts with a much better processing power than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a camera that is just as good as the OPPO Find X7 Ultra one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a tinier camera sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, it also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.