Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is a lot better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having a 91.3 score against 73.5. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14. Although the Galaxy A52 5G is way older than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's body is thinner and lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much faster processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and faster). OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels, a little larger screen and a better screen density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a better memory to install games and applications than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G's camera is very similar to OPPO Find X7 Ultra's camera, because although the Galaxy A52 5G has a tinier sensor capturing lower quality photos and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.