Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is much better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, getting a 91.1 score against 73.5. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52s has older 11 version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14. The Galaxy A52s construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before.
The Galaxy A52s features a very superior performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster). OPPO Find X7 Ultra has an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution, a higher display pixels density and a little larger display.
The Galaxy A52s counts with more memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A52s both count with incredibly similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has worse video frame rate and a smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.