Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A6 has a score of 75.8, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 global score. Galaxy A6's design is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, although it was released 6 years before. Samsung Galaxy A6 counts with a much faster CPU than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a bigger display and a much higher pixel quantity per inch of display. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a way better battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. OPPO Find X7 Ultra shoots way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a back facing camera with a way better 50 MP resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.