Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, getting a general score of 76.9 against 73.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy A70 is much older than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A70 has the previous 10 version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a better 1440 x 3168 resolution, a little bit bigger display and a higher pixels quantity in each inch of display. The Galaxy A70 features just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a lot better processing power than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra has just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra captures a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos and better 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.