Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 512 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is much better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, getting a score of 87.5 against 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy A71 construction is lighter and thinner than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, although it was released 4 years before. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has older 11 version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14.
Galaxy A71 has a lot better processing power than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster). OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has a little larger screen, a better screen density and a higher 1440 x 3168px resolution.
Galaxy A71 takes clearer photographs and videos than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality videos and pictures and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 has a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A71, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.