Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 512 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is a lot better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 overall score. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14. Even though the Galaxy A71 5G UW is older than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a better 1440 x 3168 resolution, a better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a little larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a lot better performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and faster).
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features more memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots clearer photographs and videos than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller sensor taking lower quality videos and images and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.