Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's general score of 73.5. Although the Galaxy Fold is notably older and heavier than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's design is still way thinner. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel number per inch of screen and a bit higher 1440 x 3168 resolution. Galaxy Fold features a very superior processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger number of cores (and faster).
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because it has 256 GB more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X7 Ultra features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4380mAh.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.